Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
J Clin Nurs ; 2022 Sep 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20233910

ABSTRACT

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the FreeStyle Libre device implantation in adult type 1 diabetics in a Health Area of Castilla La Mancha (Spain) during the COVID-19 pandemic. BACKGROUND: FreeStyle Libre is a so-called mHealth device that supports health care. During COVID-1 confinement, diabetic patients could have improved their glycaemic monitoring thanks to these devices, although health care in these patients may have been limited due to confinement. METHODS: A 12-month longitudinal study in which a total of 206 type I diabetics participated, belonging to a single health area. Sociodemographic and analytical data and the Self Care Inventory Revised questionnaire (SCI-R) were collected. STROBE checklist was followed. RESULTS: The analysis showed differences related to the use of the sensor. After the study period, patients obtained better levels of basal glucose, glycosylated haemoglobin, creatinine, cholesterol, triglycerides and LDL. In addition, a significant increase in the total score of the SCI-R questionnaire was observed after the use of the monitor (MD -7.77; 95% CI -10.43, -8.29). The same occurred with different SCI-R items such as diet (MD -2.995; 95% CI -3.24, -2.57), glucose determination (MD -3.21; 95% CI -3.52, -2.91), medication administration (MD -2.58; 95% CI -2.53, -1.96) and hypoglycaemic episodes (MD -1.07; 95% CI -1.21, -0.93). In the analysis by groups, worse values of glycosylated haemoglobin and adherence to treatment (p < .05) were observed in overweight/obese subjects versus those with normal weight after one year of study. CONCLUSION: The use of flash monitoring is related to better adherence to most of the recommended habits in diabetes. Nevertheless, there seems to be no relationship with an improvement in physical exercise and preventive aspects of diabetes. A good nursing intervention to support physical exercise and the use of mHealth devices could improve the control of diabetic patients. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The use of this mHealth device has shown positive results and reduced complications. Despite less contact with healthcare facilities due to the pandemic, type 1 diabetic patients have improved their blood results and adherence after using the device for one year. Nursing staff should focus on promoting physical activity and routine disease care in type 1 diabetics.

2.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care ; 11(3)2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20239021

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: It has been suggested that type 1 diabetes was associated with increased COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. However, their causal relationship is still unclear. Herein, we performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the causal effect of type 1 diabetes on COVID-19 infection and prognosis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The summary statistics of type 1 diabetes were obtained from two published genome-wide association studies of European population, one as a discovery sample including 15 573 cases and 158 408 controls, and the other data as a replication sample consisting of 5913 cases and 8828 controls. We first performed a two-sample MR analysis to evaluate the causal effect of type 1 diabetes on COVID-19 infection and prognosis. Then, reverse MR analysis was conducted to determine whether reverse causality exists. RESULTS: MR analysis results showed that the genetically predicted type 1 diabetes was associated with higher risk of severe COVID-19 (OR=1.073, 95% CI: 1.034 to 1.114, pFDR=1.15×10-3) and COVID-19 death (OR=1.075, 95% CI: 1.033 to 1.119, pFDR=1.15×10-3). Analysis of replication dataset showed similar results, namely a positive association between type 1 diabetes and severe COVID-19 (OR=1.055, 95% CI: 1.029 to 1.081, pFDR=1.59×10-4), and a positively correlated association with COVID-19 death (OR=1.053, 95% CI: 1.026 to 1.081, pFDR=3.50×10-4). No causal association was observed between type 1 diabetes and COVID-19 positive, hospitalized COVID-19, the time to the end of COVID-19 symptoms in the colchicine treatment group and placebo treatment group. Reverse MR analysis showed no reverse causality. CONCLUSIONS: Type 1 diabetes had a causal effect on severe COVID-19 and death after COVID-19 infection. Further mechanistic studies are needed to explore the relationship between type 1 diabetes and COVID-19 infection and prognosis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/genetics , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/genetics , Genome-Wide Association Study , Mendelian Randomization Analysis
3.
Curr Diabetes Rev ; 2022 May 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2251825

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diabetes Mellitus Type 1 is a chronic metabolic disorder the treatment of which extremely burdens the patient. The lockdown, as a measure to prevent the spreading of the 2019 corona virus disease, was a major challenge for the general public. People with chronic diseases, such as T1D patients, have complex emotional and psychological needs and are at increased risk for both depressive symptoms and anxiety. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of body mass index of T1D patients on the psychological symptoms and eating habits, as well as the prognostic factors of the psychological symptoms during the lockdown period. METHOD: Diabetes mellitus patients were invited to complete this survey from the outpatient Diabetes clinic of the General Hospital of Chania and the "AHEPA" General University Hospital of Thessaloniki in Greece. Psychological symptoms were assessed using the DASS-42 questionnaire and eating habits were assessed using the EAT-26 questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall, 112 T1D patients were analyzed (response rate: 28.8%). Obese T1D patients appear to be at greater risk of developing psychological symptoms such as depression, anxiety, and stress. Furthermore, disordered eating behaviors and bulimia and food preoccupation subscale were associated with psychological symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggested that obese T1D patients are at greater risk of developing psychological symptoms and an eating disorder is being triggered to reduce the negative psychological symptoms. The results of this study may guide targeted interventions among T1D patients.

4.
Revista Portuguesa De Endocrinologia Diabetes E Metabolismo ; 17(45019):145-148, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2245475

ABSTRACT

SARS-CoV-2 infection may be related to new-onset diabetes and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). We describe a long-term follow-up of 3 cases presented in the Emergency Department with DKA and COVID-19. In 2 of them, the clinical course permitted withdrawal of insulin therapy during follow-up. The third case, a more serious one with pulmonary thromboembolism, continued to require bedtime insulin during the follow-up period. Such cases demonstrate that insulin treatment can control glucotoxicity and help beta cells recover after an acute insult such as COVID-19.

5.
Revista Portuguesa De Endocrinologia Diabetes E Metabolismo ; 17(45019):97-101, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2239469

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Our aim was to characterize new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) cases in a pediatric population referred to a large pediatric diabetic center throughout the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, comparing it to previous years. Methods: Retrospective study including patients under 18 years with new-onset T1D, from March 12th 2020 to March 11(th) 2021. A control group was defined using data on patients under 18 years with new-onset T1D referred to the same hospital in the 3 previous years (from March 2017 to March 2020). Data was analyzed using SPSS. A p value of 0.05 was used as threshold of significance. Results: Between March 12(th) 2020 and March 12(th) 2021, 44 patients were diagnosed with new-onset T1D. The control group included 96 patients, resulting in an incidence of 32 cases/year (37.5% rise). January 2021 was the month with the higher number of diagnosis, corresponding to the peak of novel SARS-CoV-2 infections. During the pandemic, new-onset T1D cases in children under 2 years-old doubled, when comparing to mean incidence in previous years. Median delay to diagnosis was not significantly different from previous years. Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at presentation was present in 50% of cases that were diagnosed after lockdown, increasing substantially from previous years (38.5%). DKA's severity was also significantly higher (40.9%, p=0.04), as were Intensive Care Unit admission (13.6%, p=0.04). Conclusion: Despite the existance of molecular pathways that could lead to islet cell injury, the role of the new coronavirus in the pathogenesis of DKA and T1D onset is still unclear. Disease severity could also be related to a higher proportion of younger children.

6.
Nursing ; 53(1):41974.0, 2023.
Article in English | CINAHL | ID: covidwho-2238080

ABSTRACT

Dogs can detect human stress... Children with COVID-19 at higher risk of T1D... ED-ICU not associated with substantially increased costs... Strategies to reduce pediatric deaths by guns... Electronic gaming and pediatric dysrhythmias

7.
Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab ; 2022 Nov 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2233870

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is one of the most common chronic diseases in childhood. Because acute glycaemic com-plications account for most concerns in the management of T1DM in children, special attention during the challenging time of the global COVID-19 pandemic is required to prevent deteriorations resulting in acute hospitalization. AIM OF THE STUDY: is to assess how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced the incidence and causes of acute hospitalizations and emergency room visits in adolescents with established type 1 diabetes mellitus, and to characterize the admitted population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted as a retrospective evaluation of acute hospitalizations of 39 T1DM patients between 15 and 17 years of age in the period 2018-2021. RESULTS: No difference was noted in the incidence of acute hospitalizations and DKA or the biochemical parameters of adolescents with T1DM between the pre-COVID (23 patients in 2018-2019) and COVID period (16 patients in 2020-2021). It is, howev-er, worth underlying that 6/11 (55%) patients hospitalised in 2021 experienced diabetes deterioration as a result of emo-tional distress - a phenomenon that was not present in the pre-COVID era. After excluding of the hospitalizations due to psy-chosocial causes, a significant decrease in the number of acute hospitalizations in the COVID period was observed. CONCLUSIONS: We suppose that increased parental supervision during the pandemic might have prevented some of the episodes of severe disease decompensation, but this was masked by the sharp increase in hospitalizations due to emotional distress. Our data confirmed that psycho-emotional status is an important factor in the treatment of T1DM.

8.
Mundo da Saude ; 46:392-400, 2022.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2217710

ABSTRACT

Access to diabetes medications is critical to disease control. However, social distancing in the COVID-19 pandemic may have limited the provision of medicines and supplies. Thus, the objective of this study was to analyze the sources of obtaining diabetes drugs in the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. The data came from the DIABETESvid survey, and this analysis considered a convenience sample of 1608 participants who responded to the questionnaire published on social media of scientific societies related to diabetes. This is a cross-sectional study, conducted in the form of a web survey, from September 1 to October 19, 2020. The outcome analyzed was the sources for obtaining diabetes drugs categorized in pharmacies of the "Sistema Único de Saúde", pharmacies of the "Aqui tem Farmácia Popular” program, as well as private pharmacies and drugstores and other sources. Most participants self-reported a diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus (49.8%), used insulin (61.9%), and had a private health plan (68.7%). Private pharmacies and drugstores and other sources were the main places where medicines for diabetes were supplied (47.5%). Participants residing in the Midwest region of the country had a lower frequency of supply in pharmacies in the "Aqui tem Farmácia Popular” program (0.57;95%CI 0.36-0.92). In the studied sample, there was a higher frequency of supply of diabetes drugs in private pharmacies and drugstores and other sources with a reduction in frequency in public pharmacies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. © 2022 Centro Universitario Sao Camilo. All rights reserved.

9.
Practice Nursing ; 33(9):388-388, 2022.
Article in English | CINAHL | ID: covidwho-2025632

ABSTRACT

The article offers news briefs related to practice nursing in the United Kingdom as of September 2022 including the release of a guidance on type 1 diabetes in adults, the availability of resources for COVID-19 autumn booster, and the updated guide on eye care for non-ophthalmic nursing staff.

10.
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine ; 282(4):275-279, 2022.
Article in Japanese | Ichushi | ID: covidwho-1995354

ABSTRACT

1型糖尿病患者では新型コロナウイルス感染症(COVID-19)の重症化および死亡リスクが高いことか報告されており、若年者でも注意が必要である。重症化・死亡と関連する因子として急性合併症の糖尿病性ケトアシドーシス(DKA)および慢性合併症の細小血管・大血管合併症があり、適切な血糖コントロールでこれらの合併症を予防することが重要である。また、わが国で使用されているCOVID-19の治療薬は糖尿病患者を含んだ研究で有効性が確かめられている。ワクチンの接種に関しては非糖尿病者と同等の副反応で、同等の抗体価が期待できるため、接種は推奨されると考えられる。パンデミックによる生活様式の変容は1型糖尿病患者の血糖コントロールへ影響を及ぼしたが、改善・増悪ともに報告されており、患者ごとの生活様式の変容に合わせて適切な対応をとることが重要である。ワクチンやCOVID-19に関連した新規の1型糖尿病の発症が疫学的に示唆されているが、いまだ不明な点か多くさらなる知見が必要である。(著者抄録)

11.
Mater Sociomed ; 34(1): 4-7, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1924544

ABSTRACT

Background: COVID-19 infection has shown many complications on all organ systems, including the pancreas, during the acute phase of infection and in the post covid period. Objective: Our goal was to compare the frequency of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the Outpatient Clinic "Srce Sarajeva", in the year before COVID-19, 2019, and during the COVID-19 infection, in 2020 and 2021. Our second goal was to monitor the incidence of diabetes after COVID-19 infection, the time of onset after the acute phase of the disease, and treatment options for individual patients depending on the value of glucose. Methods: The study was designed as a retrospective-prospective, with the consent of the Director of the Outpatient Clinic "Srce Sarajeva", and patient consent, in the period of January 2019 to December 2021. The study included 371 patients at the age between 18-70. Results: In 2020 and 2021 there was a significant difference in the number of patient diagnosed with diabetes who came for examination, compared to 2019. The number of new-onset diagnosed patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes was significantly higher in 2020 and 2021 compared to 2019. In 2020, out of five newly discovered type 1, 3 of them, with an average age of 23 (+/- 1-4), overcame COVID-19 infection, and diabetes was detected 3-4 weeks after overcoming COVID-19 infection. Of the 122 type 2 patients, 19 were newly diagnosed, 47 were of average age (+/- 2-6), 13 were COVID-19 infected, and diabetes was detected 4-6 weeks after infection. In 2021, out of 4 newly discovered type 1, 3 of them, with an average age of 22 (+/- 1-2), overcame COVID-19 infection, and diabetes was detected 2-3 weeks after overcoming COVID-19 infection. Of the 114 type 2 patients, 32 were newly diagnosed, 45 were of average age (+/- 2-6), 23 were COVID-19 infected, and diabetes was detected 6-8 weeks after infection. Conclusion: COVID-19 infection adversely affects the pancreatic tissue leading to the clinical picture of type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and all patients, especially those at high risk of developing the disease suggest blood sugar testing, 3-4 weeks after the acute phase of the disease, and earlier if they were on corticosteroid therapy.

12.
Diabetol Metab Syndr ; 14(1): 75, 2022 May 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1902406

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Optimal glycemic control is the main goal for patients with diabetes. The results of type 1 diabetes patients' neglected demands during the pandemic can determine a long-term negative clinical, social, and economic impact, and result in worse diabetes control and a higher incidence of chronic complications. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak in the quality of care of patients with type 1 diabetes in Southern Brazil. METHODS: Cohort study based on electronic medical records of patients with type 1 diabetes, with scheduled appointments between January 1st 2020, and November 6th 2020, at a university public hospital. The quality indicators used were: assessment of albuminuria and/or serum creatinine, lipid profile, thyroid-stimulating hormone, glycated hemoglobin, retinopathy, and neuropathy. McNemar test was used to analyze categorical variables and the Wilcoxon test for continuous variables. RESULTS: Out of 289 patients, 49.5% were women aged 40 ± 12 years old. During the pandemic, 252 patients had at least one face-to-face appointment canceled. The quality of care indicators showed a significant worsening during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the previous year (p < 0.001). In 2019, 23.2% of the participants had all the indicators evaluated, while in 2020, during the pandemic, only 3.5% had all of them evaluated. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic hindered the offer of comprehensive and quality care to patients with type 1 diabetes.

13.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care ; 10(3)2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1883277

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Various studies have shown a number of glycemic parameters to improve over several weeks in people with type 1 diabetes during the first surge of the COVID-19 pandemic. Whether and to what extent such improvement is sustained during following COVID-19 surges remains unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate glycemic parameters during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in people with type 1 diabetes and to determine factors associated with glycemic improvement. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was an observational cohort study in people with type 1 diabetes, aged ≥16 years. We compared glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and flash glucose monitoring (FGM) downloads between the prelockdown period and approximately 1 year thereafter. Using logistic regression analysis, we assessed associations between an HbA1c reduction of at least 0.5% (~5.5 mmol/mol) with baseline clinical characteristics and self-reported changes in psychological well-being and lifestyle behavior related to COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 437 participants were included. As compared with prepandemic data, 1 year after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns, HbA1c had decreased from 7.9%±1.1% (63±12 mmol/mol) to 7.5%±1.0% (59±11 mmol/mol) (p<0.001), whereas time in range increased from 55.8%±16.7% to 58.6%±16.7% (p=0.004) and time below (<3.9 mmol/L) and above (>13.9 mmol/L) range and glucose variability all decreased (all p<0.05). FGM use, higher HbA1c at baseline and current smoking were independently associated with an HbA1c decrease of at least 0.5%, whereas self-reported changes in psychological well-being and lifestyle behavior related to the first surge of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns were not. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic and related lockdown measures were associated with improvement in glucometrics, including HbA1c and FGM data, in individuals with type 1 diabetes, particularly in FGM users, those with higher HbA1c at baseline or current smokers.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Blood Glucose , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Glucose , Humans , Pandemics
14.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care ; 10(2)2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1854318

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is the most common form of diabetes in children, accounting for 96% of cases, with 29 000 children affected in the UK. Studies have recently identified immunotherapies that safely delay the development of T1D for at least 3 years, and further therapies are in development. General population screening programs in other countries can now accurately identify children with presymptomatic T1D who can be entered into prevention studies. The UK does not have such a system in place. We aim to explore whether parents and children in the UK would want to be part of such a program of testing for T1D in the general population, how they would want to be informed and participate in such a program, and how any barriers to recruitment and participation can be addressed. Additionally, the views of stakeholders who would be involved in the testing program will be collected and analyzed. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We will interview parents/guardians and children aged 3-13 years about their views on screening for T1D. We will recruit purposefully to ensure representation across ethnicities and socioeconomic groups. Interviews will be transcribed, analyzed and used to inform iterative co-design work with additional families to address any issues raised. Similar qualitative work will be undertaken with professional stakeholders who would be involved in implementing any future screening program. Where possible, all aspects of this study will be performed remotely by phone or online to minimize infection risk. CONCLUSIONS: This qualitative study will provide the first insights into acceptability of testing and monitoring for T1D in the general population from the perspective of families and stakeholders in the UK. Co-design work will help establish the barriers and identify strategies to mitigate and overcome these issues, as an important step towards consideration of national testing for T1D.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Child , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/therapy , Humans , Qualitative Research , United Kingdom/epidemiology
15.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care ; 9(2)2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1583133

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We explored the clinical and biochemical differences in demographics, presentation and management of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This observational study included all episodes of DKA from April 2014 to September 2020 in a UK tertiary care hospital. Data were collected on diabetes type, demographics, biochemical and clinical features at presentation, and DKA management. RESULTS: From 786 consecutive DKA, 583 (75.9%) type 1 diabetes and 185 (24.1%) type 2 diabetes episodes were included in the final analysis. Those with type 2 diabetes were older and had more ethnic minority representation than those with type 1 diabetes. Intercurrent illness (39.8%) and suboptimal compliance (26.8%) were the two most common precipitating causes of DKA in both cohorts. Severity of DKA as assessed by pH, glucose and lactate at presentation was similar in both groups. Total insulin requirements and total DKA duration were the same (type 1 diabetes 13.9 units (9.1-21.9); type 2 diabetes 13.9 units (7.7-21.1); p=0.4638). However, people with type 2 diabetes had significantly longer hospital stay (type 1 diabetes: 3.0 days (1.7-6.1); type 2 diabetes: 11.0 days (5.0-23.1); p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this population, a quarter of DKA episodes occurred in people with type 2 diabetes. DKA in type 2 diabetes presents at an older age and with greater representation from ethnic minorities. However, severity of presentation and DKA duration are similar in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, suggesting that the same clinical management protocol is equally effective. People with type 2 diabetes have longer hospital admission.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diabetic Ketoacidosis , Adult , Aged , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/diagnosis , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/epidemiology , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/therapy , Ethnic and Racial Minorities , Ethnicity , Humans , Minority Groups , Retrospective Studies
16.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care ; 9(2)2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1518143

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced the accessibility to hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) tests required for virtual diabetes clinics. The aim was to develop and validate a user-friendly postal system for remote HbA1c monitoring. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Validation: A total of 123 capillary blood samples from people with diabetes (PWD) needing face-to-face consultations along with healthy volunteers were measured on a point-of-care (POC) Siemens DCA Vantage Analyzer. Another sample of 5-10 drops was simultaneously collected in a K2EDTA tube (BD Microtainer) and stored for up to 12 days at room temperature for subsequent retesting. Feasibility: During October to December 2020, a total of 286 postal HbA1c kits were sent to PWD prior to their virtual consultation. These contained sample collection guidance, the necessary equipment and a feedback form. As per Packing Instruction 650 regulations, these were posted back to the diabetes center for HbA1c testing on the POC analyzer. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between the first and the stored sample (R2=0.978). There was a small clinically insignificant negative bias -1.53 mmol/mol (2 SD = 3.10 mmol/mol). Bland-Altman plots showed 93% of results within 2 SD. Of the 87% of returned kits, only one sample failed to be analyzed. 94% of PWD who provided feedback were happy to use the postal HbA1c system again. CONCLUSIONS: A robust user-friendly postal HbA1c system has been created and successfully integrated into clinical practice using the existing POC equipment at the diabetes center. It provides accurate HbA1c results and is an invaluable tool for remote monitoring of HbA1c in PWD-both during and after the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Feasibility Studies , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
17.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis ; 31(7): 2151-2155, 2021 06 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1246118

ABSTRACT

AIM: To discuss available information on the opportunity for pregnant women affected by diabetes/obesity to receive COVID-19 vaccine. DATA SYNTHESIS: Pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection are at high risk for severe acute respiratory syndrome and adverse outcomes. Pregnant women with severe COVID-19 present increased rates of preterm delivery (<37 gestational weeks), cesarean delivery and neonatal admissions to the intensive care unit. Comorbidity such as diabetes (pregestational or gestational) or obesity further increased maternal and fetal complications. It is known that diabetic or obese patients with COVID-19 present an unfavorable course and a worse prognosis, with a direct association between worse outcome and suboptimal glycol-metabolic control or body mass index (BMI) levels. Critical COVID-19 infection prevention is important for both mother and fetus. Vaccination during pregnancy is a common practice. Vaccines against COVID-19 are distributed across the world with some population considered to have a priority. Since pregnant women are excluded from clinical trials very little information are available on safety and efficacy of COVD-19 vaccines during pregnancy. However, it is well known the concept of passive immunization of the newborn obtained with transplacental passage of protective antibodies into the fetal/neonatal circulation after maternal infection or vaccination. Moreover, it has been reported that COVID-19 vaccine-induced IgG pass to the neonates through breastmilk. Therefore, maternal vaccination can protect mother, fetus and baby. CONCLUSIONS: After an individual risk/benefit evaluation pregnant and lactating women should be counselled to receive COVID-19 vaccines.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/metabolism , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19/prevention & control , Diabetes, Gestational/blood , Lactation , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Pregnancy in Diabetics/blood , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Vaccination , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Biomarkers/blood , Body Mass Index , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Clinical Decision-Making , Diabetes, Gestational/diagnosis , Diabetes, Gestational/therapy , Female , Glycemic Control , Humans , Immunity, Maternally-Acquired , Maternal-Fetal Exchange , Milk, Human/immunology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/blood , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/immunology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Pregnancy in Diabetics/diagnosis , Pregnancy in Diabetics/therapy , Prenatal Care , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Vaccination/adverse effects
18.
J Diabetes Metab Disord ; 20(1): 939-950, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1169058

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at high risk of fatal outcomes. This meta-analysis quantifies the prevalence of mortality among (1) diabetic and (2) non-diabetic, and (3) the prevalence of DM, in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Published studies were retrieved from four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and medRxiv) and appraised critically utilizing the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's tool. Meta-analyses were performed using the random-effects model. The measures of heterogeneity were ascertained by I- squared (I 2 ) and Chi-squared (Chi 2 ) tests statistics. Predictors of heterogeneity were quantified using meta-regression models. RESULTS: Of the reviewed 475 publications, 22 studies (chiefly case series (59.09 %)), sourcing data of 45,775 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, were deemed eligible. The weighted prevalence of mortality in hospitlized COVID-19 patients with DM (20.0 %, 95 % CI: 15.0-26.0; I 2 , 96.8 %) was 82 % (1.82-time) higher than that in non-DM patients (11.0 %, 95 % CI: 5.0-16.0; I 2 , 99.3 %). The prevalence of mortality among DM patients was highest in Europe (28.0 %; 95 % CI: 14.0-44.0) followed by the United States (20.0 %, 95 % CI: 11.0-32.0) and Asia (17.0 %, 95 % CI: 8.0-28.0). Sample size and severity of the COVID-19 were associated (p < 0.05) with variability in the prevalence of mortality. The weighted prevalence of DM among hospitalized COVID-19 patients was 20 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 15-25, I 2 , 99.3 %). Overall, the quality of the studies was fair. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients were appreciably burdened with a high prevalence of DM. DM contributed to the increased risk of mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients compared to non-DM patients, particularly among critically ill patients. Registration: PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42020196589). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-021-00779-2.

19.
Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab ; 26(4): 167-175, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1112834

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: On March 11, 2020 the WHO announced a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Lockdown restrictions, compromised access to medical care and fear of potential exposure to SARS-CoV-2 have forced patients with non-COVID-19 illnesses such as type 1 diabetes (T1D) to stay home. This situation can lead to delay in T1D diagnosis and insulin treatment resulting in rapid progression to diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and therefore increased risk of complications and death.  . AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency and severity of DKA at the onset of T1D in children diagnosed in our department during COVID-19 pandemic lockdown from March 2020 till May 2020 in comparison to corresponding period of the previous year. . MATERIAL AND METHODS: We collected data of children with newly diagnosed T1D. DKA was defined according to ISPAD guidelines. . RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 34 children in group 2020 and 52 in group 2019 with an average age 9.90 ±4.9 vs. 9.59±4.7 years with mean HbA1c 12.9 ±2.4 vs. 11.5 ±2.2%, respectively. The incidence of DKA was higher by 12% in group 2020 vs. 2019 (52.94% vs 40.38%; p = 0.276).  Regarding the DKA severity (2020 vs. 2019) 32.35% vs. 11.54% were severe (p = 0.026), 17.65 vs. 13% were moderate (p = 0.759), and 2.94 vs. 15.38% were mild (p = 0.081). None of the analyzed patients were COVID-19 positive. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown changes in society and health care system, the DKA rate has increased by 12 percentage points with more severe cases noted in children with newly diagnosed T1D. Regular education of the whole society about the symptoms of diabetes could contribute to faster diagnosis of T1D and reduction of DKA prevalence. .


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/diagnosis , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/etiology , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Quarantine/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Poland/epidemiology , Prevalence , Quarantine/trends , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
20.
J Clin Transl Endocrinol ; 22: 100238, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-843953

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To evaluate pediatric type 1 diabetes telehealth visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on assessing the usability of these visits and gathering patient perspectives. METHODS: An online survey, which included a validated telehealth usability questionnaire, was offered via email to families with a telephone or virtual visit since the COVID-19-related cancellation of routine in-person care. Survey data was linked with the British Columbia (BC) Clinical Diabetes Registry. Outcomes between groups were assessed using Welch's t-test. Associations with type of visit as well as with desire to return to in-person care were assessed with logistic regression models. RESULTS: The response rate was 47%. Of 141 survey respondents, 87 had clinical data available in the BC Clinical Diabetes Registry, and thus were included in our analysis. Overall, telephone and virtual visits were rated highly for usability. Telephone visits were easier to learn to use, and simpler to understand; however, telephone and virtual visits were similar across multiple areas. No factors associated with choosing one type of visit over the other, or with desire to return to in-person care, could be identified. 72% of participants want future telehealth care; however, some would like all future care to be in-person. CONCLUSIONS: Telephone and virtual visits had impressive usability. Many families want telehealth to play a significant part in their future care.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL